Project management with Agile vs Traditional Methodologies

Posted By Mdap on 18/05/2018 | 0 comments


Project management with Agile vs Traditional Methodologies

Posted by on 18/05/2018 |

Many companies have been using more dynamic and collaborative working methods for years. Without renouncing to the hierarchy, the aim is to work in teams and customer satisfaction is paramount. This trend and context has led project managers to increasingly implement Agile vs traditional methodologies. But it would be a mistake to consider the traditional ones obsolete and apply the agile model systematically.

Agile methodologies in project management provide dynamism, efficiency and quality. You want fast results and customer satisfaction. On the other hand, traditional methodologies are more complex, planned and rigid.

As a project manager it is important to know how to analyse and decide which methodologies are most suitable for a given project. Below we compare versus Agile versus traditional methodologies.

Management of changes in the project

Agile methodologies are specialists in dealing with change and do not have too many problems managing uncertainty. We could say that changes are considered opportunities to increase customer satisfaction.

Since the work is divided into iterations as soon as a change occurs, the necessary adjustments can be made. Changes are part of the evolution of a project. In this respect, KANBAN is one of the most flexible methods of the agile model.

On the other hand, in traditional methodologies, if such changes have not been contemplated or if there is great uncertainty in the product market, we may have problems. Because everything is more planned, such contingencies can affect different phases of the project life cycle.

The project team in Agile vs Traditional Methodologies

Agile methodologies seek to simplify protocols and reduce the hierarchy. Self-organizing work teams are formed, which can increase self-esteem and motivation. By assuming certain responsibilities, team members are empowered and at the same time the project manager delegates responsibilities.

It is important to remember that one of the fundamental values of the Agile model is to place people and their interactions above processes. While traditional models are more process oriented.

In contrast to traditional methodologies, the project manager has full control. Everything is done from their perspective. There are managers who understand that this is the natural way to proceed and find it more difficult to manage with the agile model.

The project contracts

Agile methodologies maintain a closer collaboration with the customer. Contracts can be variable in scope, which positions us almost as partners of the client.

On the other hand, with traditional methodology we aspire to have everything tied up from the beginning. It’s about sticking to the plan and that’s why the contracts are stricter.

Project costs with Agile vs Traditional Methodologies

Project costs are usually lower with agile methodologies. Mainly because we start from the minimum and scale according to needs. This reduces the number of people involved and avoids wasting resources.

If things do not work as planned, the agile model will adapt quickly. On the other hand, with a traditional methodology, where we have to predict everything in detail, it is more difficult to adapt.

In the traditional methodology the priority is the vision we have of the project. If we have made a good planning the costs will be as expected and everyone will be happy. However, if we have made a mistake, we not only increase costs but also reduce profits.

What methodology should I use in my project? If you still have questions, perhaps you should consider taking our Master’s Degree in Project Management. We have an excellent teaching team made up of experienced professionals who offer a very complete program.


Do you want to share this entry?

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *